Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Menara U, Seksyen 13 Shah Alam

Last week aku ada jumpa dengan seorang agent hartanah. Kitorang lepak kat TTDI. Mulanya, agent ni nak beli rumah yang aku advertise, tup2 boleh jadi member then dia nak mintak tolong aku war2 kan satu project baru residential kat seksyen 13 Shah Alam. Dia kata projek ni dah hampir sold out. Unit untuk non bumi dah habis. Tinggal bumi lot je. Dia mintak tolong aku share pada client2 aku kot2 ada yang berminat.

Actually sapa yang tak kenal seksyen 13 kan. Area hot. Banyak kolej swasta kat situ. Ada PTPL, MSU n Politeknik. Hypermarket pun ada dua (Tesco n Giant).

Ni info sedikit sebanyak pasal projek ni :

Nama : Menara U
Developer : HR Group ( the same developer yang buat Persanda apartment)
Konsep : Service Apartment , commercial
Jumlah unit : 531 unit
Size : Type A (622sf) , Type B (527sf)
Harga : RM 450 - RM 480 psf / RM 240k - RM 290k
Tenure : Leasehold (date 30/10/2100)
Lokasi : Terletak bersebelahan dengan projek baru komersial Qube, apartment Persanda. Walking distance dalam 5 minit ke Kolej MSU dan Tesco.
Kemudahan : Sekuriti 24 jam ( 2 tier sekuriti), Gym, Sauna, Swimming Pool, Badminton court etc
Diskaun : 7% untuk bumi buyer

Lokasi
Layout

Interior concept


Personal Opinion :

Aku tak pandai sebenarnya nak menilai projek baru sebab pengalaman yang tidak banyak. Aku tak pernah beli projek baru so tak sure nak nilai macam mana.

Cuma dari segi pandangan kasar, projek ni terletak di lokasi yang strategik. Boleh jalan kaki je pergi MSU. Developer pula adalah developer yang bangunkan apartment Persanda yang fames tu. So rasanya developer ni ok kot. MSU pun sekarang ni sedang pesat dibangunkan. Aku di beritahu , kalau full capacity, MSU ni boleh tempatkan 10 ribu pelajar dalam satu masa. Banyak tu. MSU ni plak bukan kolej biasa. Private kolej. So tau2 la macam mana style budak2 private kolej ni kan. Geng2 dari famili banyak duit. So Apartment Persanda dan Menara U bakal jadi pilihan utama sebagai tempat tinggal oleh student2 MSU ni nanti. Yang lebih2 tu baru la tempias kat tempat2 lain macam apartment Perdana etc. Pada masa ni, setahu aku sewa di Apt Persanda dah cecah RM 2k sebulan ( sewa kat student). Harga pula dah naik sehingga RM 250k kalau tak silap.

Menara U ni boleh dikatakan akan cater untuk student2 kaya yang nakkan privacy. Kemudahan pun banyak dan high end. Selain dari tu, pusat komersial Qube pun sedang dibangunkan dan ini juga boleh menyumbang kepada pool tenant untuk Menara U ni nanti.

Cuma part harga tu la yang pada aku agak mahal. Dengan starting price rm240k, sewa yang perlu diletakkan adalah dalam sekitar rm1500 baru berbaloi. Tambahan pula ini hanya unit studio so tak ramai student boleh dimuatkan. Teknik penyewaan kena berbeza berbanding Persanda yang style sumbat student ramai2. Dulu pun aku pernah sebut pasal projek Suria Jelutong. Aku pernah cakap mahal dan tak logik orang beli tup2 dalam 2 bulan, dah nak hampir habis orang booking. So mahal murah satu2 hartanah ni relatif pada setiap individu. Kena pula time2 sekarang ni harga hartanah melambung2, maybe harga yang kita anggap mahal sebelum ini mungkin dah jadi berpatutan pada ketika ini.

Ok so kalau korang berminat nak tau lebih lanjut pasal projek ni ( aku pun tak sure bape banyak lagi unit yang tinggal sebab listing update tade kat aku. Aku pun kena refer balik pada agent yang intro kat aku projek ni), boleh la set appointment ngan aku (call / email : izwan@satusolution.com). Nanti aku kenalkan kat agent tu n korang tanya la puas2 kat agent tu nanti apa yang korang nak tau.

Oh ya, projek Suria Jelutong boleh dikatakan dah habis dibooking. Yang tinggal cuma unit2 yang besar sahaja ( rm480k ke atas). Yang dah habis tu tower B, Tower A belum start jual lagi. Kalau dah start bukak untuk booking nanti , aku update lagi.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Cerita Pasal Azizi Ali

(Sumber : M-Planet Ezine)


Azizi Ali, 48, is as versatile as it gets. A pilot, publisher, property investor and coach, author, qualified financial planner – or to put it succinctly an all-round entrepreneur. A voracious reader (he reads three books in a week!), unsurprisingly Azizi credits his success to his healthy appetite for knowledge. He quips, “The more books on money matters that you read, the wealthier you will be. This is not just a tagline. It is the truth. I wish somebody had told me that 30 years ago!”




Most of us would’ve heard of Confucius’s quote, Choose a job you love and you will never have to work for a day in your life. Azizi is a fine example of “living” that advise. His five-figure income is derived from his passion. As he puts it, he does not have to work but finds no reason to retire from doing what he loves. He says, “I only do things I like in my life. I like to fly. I like to write. I like to speak. I like business.”




StarProperty.my chats with the high-flying Azizi about his passion for money matters, his successes and a music business that cost him RM100,000.




Tell us about yourself. How did you start in property investment?



When I started my career, despite being hardworking, I only made little money. I did not have any financial knowledge and was broke most of the time. This went on for about four years. At that time, I was about 20 or 21 years old. I started my career very young. I am a pilot by profession.




Are you still a pilot today?



Yes. After a while, I wondered if I will be living hand-to-mouth until retirement. I wondered what was wrong with me. Even my colleagues then, even if they were older and married, and making the same amount as me, they were doing okay but I was broke. So something is wrong. I realised what was wrong was my knowledge of financial matters, which was practically non-existent. So I started educating myself on financial matters. The intention was not to become a millionaire, but so that I would not be broke again. This was in 1985, where there were not as many books on money matters. So to educate myself, I did what most people would do. I asked people who I thought were experts at the time. They gave advice but they were not the real experts. Though their advice was not all wrong, but it was incomplete.



As I educated myself, I began to have some money. I wasn’t broke anymore, which was great. I read more books and asked more people. But after a while, I realised that some of the advice given was opposite of what the books said. After a while, I leaned more on books. I was repeating the formula of reading more books and I knew it was working and have enough money for investments. So that’s why I tell people today, the more books on money matters you read, the wealthier you will be. This is not just a tagline. It is the truth. I wish somebody had told me that 30 years ago. I would be a lot richer.



The reality is that much of the information out there is biased. For example, insurance. Who do you ask information from? Probably insurance agents. That’s why the information is biased. So people don’t make as good a decision as it could be. That’s why you have to get different points of view.



I started investing when I was about 25 or 26 years old. Like most people, the first place was stock market. I started reading books on stocks which helped a little. Like most people, I made a little money, and lost a little money. I did a lot of work. Most people rely on tips. All in all, I suppose that I did not make money from the stock market. After a while, I started investing in properties, and then business.



My first business was a music shop, selling cassettes and CDs, in 1990. In my eagerness to become an entrepreneur, I did research, but too little. In the end, after three or four years I lost over RM100,000. Now I can laugh about it. At that time, it wasn’t funny (laughs).



Why did your music business fail to take off?



Actually, if I had done proper research, I would not open the shop. I was blinded by the light of business, and was so eager that I jumped into it. There were a lot of things that I didn’t know about before I started. The margins were very low, less than 30% − which means that I had to sell a lot to pay the rent. Plus, cassettes are so small and hence, easily stolen.



What did you do after that?



The good thing is that even though the business did not work, my personal finance was better.



You were doing other things at the same time?



Yes, just like now. Although my name is synonymous with property, it is just a small part of my business. We have to put the money from business somewhere. One of it is properties. It is very good but it’s not the only game in town. At the same time, my main business is still business. Property is just a small part. See, a couple of years ago, I bought a house for RM800,000. When it was completed, I sold it for RM1.1 million. So the profit was RM300,000 and at that time, RPGT (real property gains tax) was still at 30%. All in all, my profit was RM200,000 after two years. I suppose that’s not too bad. But in business, I can make RM200,000 per month. So where should I be concentrating on? It’s a no-brainer.



How old were you then?



I started my publishing business when I was about 37 or 38 years old.



When did you start investing in properties?



I bought a house for own stay in 1987. Property investment for rentals started in 1995.



What was your first investment?



Condominium, which I rented out. At that time, my formula is for rental. I have sold most of it.



What’s your property portfolio now?



Not a lot. I sold most of it in 2010. The net worth is maybe six million.



Why did you sell most of your properties? Is it because of the “property bubble”?



Yes. I was reading a few books that explained about the US crash. Some reasons was the low interest rate, user-friendly mortgage, questionable borrowers and current owners refinancing. I shuddered when I read it. It is exactly like in Malaysia. That’s why I wrote the article, “The US property crash, could it happen here?” For most current owners, even if their house is almost paid off, they refinance to get the money to invest in other properties because property prices have increased.



What if these owners refinance to invest because they don’t have enough cash?



In that case, they could refinance but they have to be careful with the loan’s terms.



Do elaborate on “loan terms”.



This is how it should be. If the environment is of low interest rate with rising property prices, then take as much loan as you can. This is because you can multiply your net worth very fast, assuming that you can pay every month. That formula of taking as much loan as you can and buying as many as you can was correct one or two years ago. The environment has changed and will continue to do so. Interest rates have increased. There’s the LTV (loan-to-value) ratio of 70% for third property onwards. There are more things to come, some of which you and I have never seen or faced before.



Anybody with monster mortgages will be in serious pain. So back to your question of “If you have almost paid off but do not have the capital to buy other properties, should he/she refinance?”. The answer is yes, but don’t take too much and more importantly cap the interest rate. Don’t use the current fluctuating rate, based on BLR (base lending rate). It won’t be low forever. Just to share, I have one RM1.5 million loan. The rise of 75 basis points in 2010 has caused my payments to rise by RM500. This is only 75 basis points. Can you imagine if the interest rates rise by 2 or 3%? I also will feel the pain.


Do you go for residential or commercial properties?



For me, it has been residential all the while − both condos and landed. I know that the big money is in commercial properties – higher rentals and capital gains. You need to have some knowledge of the commercial market because if you choose incorrectly, it could be empty for years. So you must really do your homework. But where there is danger, there are also opportunities. Now, I am looking at below market value properties. There are a lot of options now.



When did you start investing in auction properties?



Before that, I was buying from developers. Now, my staff cuts and highlights the interesting auction properties. I can’t take them all. The quantity has increased significantly.



Are these auction properties in good areas?



Having said that, 95% are not interesting to me. But lately, the quality in good areas has also increased. In fact, I don’t even do this full time. I only spend 10 minutes every morning to look at it and go for the interesting ones. I share some with my clients.



Do you concentrate in certain residential areas?



I go for PJ. It saves me a lot of work because I am familiar with the area, the supply and demand, and the prices.



Do you do no-money-down strategies?



Yes, the whole concept is find one below market.



Are no-money-down strategies very difficult to apply with the LTV ratio of 70%?



Yes, it is hard, but it can be done. I think the LTV of 70% is good for most people. Otherwise, they might end up taking too much loans, which they can afford now but as situation changes, they might not be able to afford it. So this might save their life.



What are the common myths about auction properties?



Despite the quantity of auction properties, I would say that 90% are not appropriate for investors. One, incorrect locations. Two, nature of auctions – the first auction might be market value, therefore it is not appropriate.



For auctions, you must do homework. Actually, in all investments you must do your homework. Whenever there are opportunities to make lots of money, it also comes with opportunities to lose a lot of money, like gold. The price of gold is rising. I put much of my money into gold in the last couple of years, which I am happy about. At the same time, gold is also full of traps. If you buy the incorrect form of gold, you may not benefit even if the price is rising.



What do you mean by “incorrect form of gold”?



Jewellery. Is it gold? Yes it is. When you buy from shops, you pay more to cover for the workmanship and profit. In that case, you already overpay, already in the negative. When you sell back to the shop, you cannot sell at the same price you bought. At best, they will buy it back at market value. They will usually buy at market value, minus 25%. That’s two negatives. Three, you can only sell back to the same shop you buy from. Fourth, if you do not have the receipt, they won’t take it back and most people don’t know where they kept the receipt. Fifth, when you go back to the shop, you cannot get cash, but instead you can trade it in for another piece of jewellery. So, five negatives. From an investment point of view, it is useless. So despite the rising price of gold, you may not benefit from it. That’s one of the traps. To know more, you can read my book – Get Into Gold.



Do you conduct a lot of seminars?



About one in every three months.



What are your seminars about?



All about money − property investments, investing in gold and information marketing.



Are they one-day seminars?



Yes, one day. I will cover the critical success factors for property investments. There are a lot of things to talk about properties. What you want to know is the critical success factors. One of them is buying below market value. Then you have to know the three elements of property investment which is physical, financial, and legal rights and obligations.



Financing is extremely important. Most landlords don’t make money from investments. So I share on how they can reduce these risks significantly. I share on how to reduce work, automate processes and system of doing this. An average investor takes loans that amount to a few hundred thousand, so they cannot afford to get it wrong. What more if the loans are in the millions. I am not only a businessman. I am also a qualified financial planner. So I look from both sides. I feel concerned for my fellow Malaysians when they lose their houses. When they search for mortgages, they only look at one thing, the lowest interest rate at that point in time.



What I do now is the personal coaching programme.



What are the terms and conditions that borrowers should take note of?



Flexibility of loan.



Are you referring to types of loans?



No, beyond that. The actual terms and conditions of the individual loan. For example, most banks have a lock-in period. That’s fine, but on top of that, some loans don’t allow you to pay extra. For some, you can pay more, but the extra payment doesn’t reduce the principal amount, which defeats the purpose. Some of them allow you to pay extra, but it must be in multiples of RM1,000, for example. I am not saying that interest rate is not important. But that’s just one of the criteria.



Tell us about the personal coaching programme?



After they sign up and meet me personally, we have one tele-seminar (seminar via telephone) for one hour per month. I will talk about specific subjects, for example, auction, estate planning, investing in gold, and so on. It is a conference call where all members will call in and listen. From time to time, I will also invite industry experts to talk. It is just like a seminar but through the phone. We also have a 20 minutes tele-coaching every month, which means that members are in touch with me on a regular basis.



This is my inner circle coaching programme.



They also get a free book every month and every four months, we have a mastermind meeting, where the whole group comes together and meet here (Azizi Ali?s office in Kelana Jaya). I do not only teach people on how to be rich. I teach people how to get rich, how to live rich, how to stay rich and how to die rich.



Most of the information that I share, I am doing it myself. So I know that it brings results. For example, investing in gold, I did the research and then I share. It is not just theory.



How many books have you written?



More than 30. They are all about money. Four on property investment – How to become property millionaire, How to become millionaire landlord, Winning at property auctions and How to pay off your house loan within five years. I also publish books by other authors. There’s one about 40 questions you want to ask your lawyer about property investment, another about Millionaire real estate guide for beginners and also one about property auction.



When do you plan to launch your next book?



No target date yet. It never ends because the moment I finish one book, I start on another (laughs). Some people play golf. Some fish. Some scuba dive. I write. I am happy doing it. I can do it for days on end. It’s not work for me. We are always on the lookout for authors. It doesn’t have to be about money. I publish books on health, parenting, cats, and so on.



Any additional advice to share with our readers?



Read as many books as you can about money matters. You will lead richer and happier life. You need to learn and read because the world is constantly changing. Many of people are innocent and they don’t know what hit them.




Copyright © Azizi Ali 2011


Saturday, May 7, 2011

Is the 5/95 housing loan scheme a better option?

(Sumber : http://www.starproperty.my/PropertyScene/TheStarOnlineHighlightBox/11878/0/0)




When Lehman Brothers fell in September 2008, the Malaysian property market entered a challenging period. There were few takers and developers were at a loss as house buyers were few. In the first quarter of 2009, one of Malaysia’s largest property developer, SP Setia group coined what was soon to become popularly known as the 5/95 scheme.



Soon after, other established property developers such as Glomac Bhd, Mah Sing Group Bhd, Malton Bhd and Sunrise Bhd followed suit with their 5/95 home loan schemeswith different degrees of success. Some of these schemes could be 10/90, where a buyer paid a 10% downpayment.



Essentially, the 5/95 scheme was meant to help boost property sales which was then being threatened by a slowing economy. Under the scheme, house buyers need to pay 5% of the downpayment while the rest will be financed through a loan. Servicing of the loan starts only when the property is up and ready.



Are these schemes beneficial to house buyers? Or is it another marketing tool of developers?



In the short term, it may seem attractive. After all, one only has to pay 5% or 10% of the price of the house and the next payment is only when one takes delivery of the house. The developer will also bear other entry costs such as legal fees, stamp duty on the sale and purchase agreement and loan agreement as well as memorandum of transfer for purchases under the campaign.



A mortgage loan officer who has done his rounds being on the panel of bankers for various developers says the conventional loans and not the interest-bearing ones, are better options in the long run.



He says that no developer will bear legal fees, interests or stamp duty for free. All these are in fact factored into the price of the house. He says that 5/95 schemes are popular particularly among entrants to the job market because they have problems forking out the downpayment, which is usually the biggest challenge when purchasing big ticket items such as a property.



Because they are young, time is on their side. Such schemes are also popular among speculators because their intention is to sell the house the minute they take delivery of it.



While it is understandable that developers need to sell, what may be prudent for buyers is to ask for an option, to either enter into a 5/95 or to go for the conventional mortgage. And if a conventional loan is possible, whether the developer will reduce the price of the house. However small that percentage may be, it will add up.



A developer of a high-rise condominium project in Petaling Jaya gave buyers an option of a 5/95 scheme or pay more for the downpayment. If a buyer were to opt for the conventional scheme, the price of the house is reduced.



Given the sharp rise in property prices last year, it may appear that most of these house buyers could be sitting on potential profits.

While house prices in the Klang Valley grew by an average of 10% a year in the last two years, selected areas saw astounding growth of 25% annually.



As most of those who bought houses under this scheme, particularly in the Klang Valley, likely comprise those from the middle to upper income bracket as well as speculators, chances of them facing difficulties servicing their loans may be low.



“These days, one can stretch the repayment period from 35 to 40 years, especially if one is in his or her late 20s or early 30s. Thus, the 5/95 scheme, together with the long repayment period, is very helpful for first time buyers,” says a banking analyst. “People like 5/95 because the initial capital outlay is low, hence it doesn’t hurt so much. One reason why property prices remain high could possibly be because the hidden cost of 5/95 is already imputed in the price. High as it may be, people continue to buy anyway,” said KGV-Lambert Smith Hampton Sdn Bhd director Anthony Chua.

Another property consultant added that 5/95 was popular because of the affordability factor.



“Many people can’t afford the down payment for the 10/90 scheme and are digging into their Employees Provident Fund. So even if 5/95 may be perceived to be more expensive, it will still remain popular, ” said the property consultant.



Chua added that with 5/95, the buyer might be paying more but he wont feel the pinch as the loan period was over a longer period.



“Furthermore, with the real property gains tax at 5%, coupled with our inflationarry environment, it also keeps the risk of buying homes under the 5/95 scheme even lower, as the house price is more likely to increase in tandem with inflation,” said the property consultant.



A banking and property analyst says the difference between 5/95 and 20/80 schemes is merely in the interest portion paid.



“When you pay interest on a 95% down payment versus interest on 80% down payment, of course the interest payment on the 80% is lower.”



She adds that there is a perception of savings under the 5/95 scheme and the buyers’ salary could increase after three years, hence reducing the stress on their balance sheet.



Zerin Properties founder and chief executive officer Previndran Singhe adds that when purchasing properties, it is all about the purchasers’ cashflow abilities. The buyer will decide based on his monthly income and his ability to service his monthly commitments.



“At the end of the day, it is only an interest issue. Everyone claims that the interest fees and other costs are built into the 5/95 scheme,” he says adding that if a property product is good and developed by a reputable property developer and in a good location, he would encourage the buyer to purchase the property via the 5/95 scheme, especially if the interest rate was low.



“What is more important is to look at the interest rate at the time, not whether it’s 5/95 or 20/80,” he says.



With interest rates going up today, the bigger question is this: Will those who buy properties under the 5/95 or 10/90 be committed to their mortgage payments, or will they take the opportunity to cash out?




Friday, May 6, 2011

Bubble? Boom? Apa pendapat anda?

( sumber : http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/16hou/Article/)

WHILE there is a great deal of concern by Malaysians about the significant increase in food prices in recent months, there is an even greater concern: the rise in house prices.


This is especially so in George Town, Petaling Jaya, Shah Alam and Kuala Lumpur.




In the last three years, there have been spectacular rises in prices of landed properties. In one suburb in the north of Kuala Lumpur, new residential property prices for link houses surpassed RM1 million.




There is truth in the National House Buyers Association's statement that the astronomical increase in house prices (old and new) in Penang, Petaling Jaya and Kuala Lumpur prevents an entire generation of young adults from buying houses.



The reasons for the rapid increase in house prices include easy availability of bank loans with low interest rates, easy payment schemes and low real property gains tax of five per cent for gains on sale of properties.




In some cases, developers' staff book properties and these change hands for a fee.




Many developers raise property prices with the excuse that the cost of labour and materials rises rapidly.




Developers contribute to the rise in house prices.




While one cannot deny that labour and material costs will rise, the extent of the rise is much lower than the rise in house prices.




The developers' prices are not justified.




Developers argue that they have holding costs and other risks associated with the business, but look at their annual profits from the sale of properties.




It is obvious that many big developers show healthy profits as, more often than not, the launches in cities are sold out within days.




The authorities need to look into this aspect of house prices in relation to the cost of labour and materials.




With the anticipated introduction of the goods and services tax, the price of properties will be higher, as developers will transfer this cost to buyers. Genuine buyers will bear the spiralling cost.




Another aspect is speculation on property prices.




Developers recently were clamouring for the government to reduce or exempt house buyers from the real property gains tax, which used to range between zero and 30 per cent, depending on the number of years of ownership, as well as a reduction in stamp duties.




The developers' argument was that because of the overhang of properties, they were unable to make sales and suffered losses.




The government then reduced the real property gains tax to five per cent for gains on properties sold within five years of purchase and zero per cent for those sold thereafter.




In the process, it gave away revenue it ought to have collected. Now look at the effects of that decision.




While I do not deny that there are pockets of unsold properties, many developers and speculators make big profits.




It is genuine house buyers who are locked out of the process.




Banks, too, contribute to this phenomenon and Bank Negara should deal with this before the bubble bursts.




The government should review the Real Property Gains Tax Act and even the Stamp Act (like in Singapore and Hong Kong) to deal with speculators.




Many speculators buy and sell properties in a short period of time and the government should consider instituting legislation to stop this.




The previous real property gains tax of 30 per cent should be brought back to tax all profits made from the sale or transfer of ownership of properties within three years.




This will discourage speculators, many of whom do not have the capacity to even put in a 20 to 30 per cent down payment on the purchase price.




Bank Negara should tighten the availability of credit, especially for those buying a second or third house. Perhaps, stamp duty should also be imposed on those who sell their properties within two years of purchase.




Prevention is better than cure. While there may not appear to be a bubble in sight, as claimed by industry players, it may be too late when it bursts and the authorities are left to clean up the mess.




Prices of properties have to be monitored and checked in relation to financial measures, such as the level of loan versus buyers' profiles and number of properties bought or sold.




First-time home owners are the hardest hit and our children will find it hard to own a house if the government does not act now.





Read more:
House prices: Bubble may burst soon http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/16hou/Article/#ixzz1LXh3moAZ